LIMSzine

LAB DATA MANAGEMENT



The following page contains information on:

Re-engineering the Lab: From Nuclear Buildup to Environmental Cleanup

The Difference Between LIMS and Networks

Growth and Change in the LIMS Marketplace

New Products


Re-engineering the Lab: From Nuclear Buildup to Environmental Cleanup

Growing environmental concerns as well as reduced defense needs are changing the face of science. No longer focused on plutonium production, the Department of Energy's (DOE) 560 square mile Hanford Site in southeastern Washington state is the largest nuclear cleanup site in the United States. Westinghouse Hanford Co., a wholly owned subsidiary of Westinghouse Electric Corp., manages the environmental restoration of some 1377 waste units containing hazardous or radioactive waste.

Westinghouse Hanford quickly realized that the aging in-house LIMS system didn't have the ability to perform the required tasks. A new LIMS was necessary. A set of functional requirements was compiled -- which included the ability to network several labs, perform a variety of analyses, address regulatory requirements, handle special situations such as hot cells, and provide for a smooth expansion -- and a Request For Proposal was put out to bid. The new system would be accessed by more than 100 users distributed in laboratories throughout the reserve.

In August 1993, IBM Federal Systems was awarded a contract for hardware with LIMS software supplied by Advanced Systems Management, Inc. (ASMI), which subcontracted technical support to Computer Task Group (CTG). After an extensive acceptance test, ASMI's MULTI LIMS software went online in January 1994 in two laboratories. Together, the three companies delivered the system on a compressed time schedule, allowing Westinghouse Hanford to meet commitments made to the DOE. While the sample load is not at its peak, it is anticipated that the new system will greatly improve reporting in the labs, thereby expediting the cleanup process.


The Difference Between LIMS and Networks

If you've been confused about the difference between LIMS and networks, you're not alone. While it sounds as if the LIMS is a network because it's managing the lab data, that's not quite the case.

LIMS are a software management tool that help labs manage and control lab information -- such as studies, samples, and sub-samples -- after acquisition, and may or may not use a network to communicate. LIMS are just one of many laboratory systems that can be placed on a network. Some LIMS functions include test scheduling, worklist generation, and lab productivity reporting.

Networks are a combination of the hardware and software that enable data communication between two or more computers. A client/server network uses one computer as the server to handle the requirements of and share resources between user, a.k.a. client, computers. The tasks that a client requests and a server performs are known as network functions, which include file transfer, remote database access, and remote program execution that enable users to move data around the lab and have an action performed on that data once moved.

Because networks facilitate the flow of information, LIMS can be more effective if the information they contain is sent over a network that can distribute it automatically. It sounds simple, and it should be, but proprietary products developed before open systems and industry standards are why it's difficult to get disparate equipment to communicate seamlessly. And that's a whole 'nother issue!


Growth and Change in the LIMS Marketplace

Don Schoeny, Group Marketing Manager for Hewlett-Packard, believes that more than one issue is driving LIMS market growth. "First, ISO 9000, GLP, GALP, and other regulatory issues that require the re-creation of test data and data retrieval and archiving are driving the LIMS market. Second, client/server computing has now become viable -- even IBM is looking at the market. Client/server technology allows people to get into a LIMS application with small capital outlay while still thinking big. Finally, UNIX, which allows a more open structure, is catching on. Analytical labs tend to be multi-vendor because most vendors don't make all the instruments needed. There's an instant realization that any LIMS system can't be single vendor or proprietary. So people tend not to select proprietary systems that have limitations.

"The barrier between the lab and the IT [Information Technology] function is breaking down as more people become computer-conversant. Everything is moving toward the unified lab and tying into the corporate structure. LIMS, like MRP and process control systems, are viewed as strategic systems. Companies are selecting products which can serve as company-wide standards to achieve economies of scale and minimize costs.

"PC's are much simpler to network than was the case three to five years ago. The infrastructure is there now. We couldn't have Ferraris before the highways were in place. For the first time ever, people can look at the lab, think of networking it, and believe it can be done."


New Products

Beckman Instruments introduced its new LabManager C/S LIMS at the Pittsburgh Conference. Incorporating a Windows GUI, LabManager C/S LIMS runs on the Oracle database, can be integrated with other standard IS systems, and provides comprehensive laboratory test, sample and data management. Beckman's new PeakPro C/S Advanced Chromatography Data System was introduced at the same time.

In other news, QSI Holding Corporation, the developers of WinLIMS software, has announced the purchase of U.S.-based Harley Systems, Inc and Germany-based Focus 9000 GmbH. Harley Systems and Focus 9000 had been the exclusive distributors of WinLIMS since the product was first marketed in 1993. For more information, contact QSI Corporation at (201) 670-8790.


The above column on Lab Data Management was written by Helen Gillespie, Web Master for the LIMSource, and reprinted from Scientific Computing & Automation, June 1994

About the LIMSzine | Library | LIMSource Contents | About the LIMSource | Home